PSD home page.


Print Options

Screen Font Size Click to decrease the font size of the body text Click to increase the font size of the body text

Printer Friendly Version



PSD Shares SAR Report Results

PSD Schools Continue to Rank High on School Accountability Reports

 

Parents should watch your mail or check your child's Friday folder in January for an in-depth report on your child's school.  From test scores to school highlights, the School Accountability Reports will provide you with detailed information about your child's school.

 

How does PSD compare with schools across the state?  Overall, 40 PSD schools (74 percent) ranked High or Excellent in Academic Performance on the Colorado School Accountability Reports (SARs), announced December 10 by the Colorado Department of Education (CDE). Statewide, 44 percent of all schools rated High or Excellent in 2007-2008.

 

School Academic Performance Rankings Based on CSAP Scores Grades 3-10

Overall, 13 PSD schools were rated Excellent, 27 schools were rated High, 10 schools were rated Average, and 1 alternative school was rated Low in Academic Performance of State Assessments, which is calculated using Colorado Student Assessment Program (CSAP) test scores in reading, writing, and math in elementary and junior high schools and 10th-grade CSAP and 11th-grade ACT scores in high schools.

 

Each school in the state received one of the following ratings: Excellent, High, Average, Low or Unsatisfactory. No PSD school was ranked Unsatisfactory. Two alternative educational programs or schools were exempt from this year’s reporting: Centennial High School and Poudre Transition Center.

 

Academic Growth of Students Rating Uses New Colorado Growth Model

Beginning in 2008, the SAR school growth measure is based on the Colorado Academic Growth Model, which provides a way to understand how much academic growth a student made from one CSAP administration to the next. The Growth Model compares each student's performance to students in the same grade throughout Colorado who had similar CSAP scores in past years and calculates a Student Growth Percentile. For example, if a student grew as much or more than 60 percent of her peers, the student would have a 60th growth percentile.

 

Each school’s overall SAR median growth percentile is calculated by combining the reading, writing and math student growth percentiles for all SAR-eligible students into one large dataset. Calculations are completed on this dataset, taking into account school size and the comparison of a school’s growth percentiles to the state median of 50.  Depending on the calculation, a school is categorized as having High, Typical, or Low growth.

 

Colorado Growth Model calculations are not comparable to previous SAR Growth ratings.

 

On the 2008 SARs growth category calculated by CDE for each school 17 PSD schools were ranked in the High growth category, 22 schools were ranked in the Typical category, and 12 schools were ranked in the Low growth category.  High school rankings are based only on one grade level’s CSAP scores—10th graders—since PSD’s 9th graders still attend junior highs, and CSAP tests are not given in 11th and 12th grades.

 

“The School Accountability Reports continue to show that Poudre School District is a high performing district and that our teachers and students do an outstanding job of educating every child every day,” says Chuck DeWayne, director of student assessment and accreditation. “These reports are one more tool we use to assess at our performance and to help us determine areas for improvement.”

 

PSD Uses Variety of Measures to Determines Student Progress

The SARs are one of many accountability measures PSD uses to determine student progress. CSAP scores, Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), district Measures of Academic Performance (MAP) testing, and classroom performance data are all used by schools to develop and implement their annual school improvement plans.

 

Other data also is listed in each School Accountability Report, including CSAP scores by grade, teacher experience, student/teacher ratios, students in or near poverty level (noted as “students eligible for the federal free and reduced-price lunch program”), safety and discipline, and student attendance.

 

“It’s difficult to accurately compare one school to another based on these ratings for several reasons,” says Manny Ortega, executive director of secondary schools. “Each school has a unique community and faces its own economic, social, and even geographic challenges, and the School Accountability Reports really do not take these differences into consideration. Whether it’s language, mobility or socioeconomic differences, these factors play a role in student performance.”

 

PSD continues to address the needs of its lower-rated schools on a number of levels:

·     School Accreditation Plans are being implemented in all schools to address strategies for helping low-performing students. Improvement strategies are listed in each school’s accreditation report and plan.

·     PSD now has extensive diagnostic analysis from the CSAP testing program to use to improve instruction. This provides detailed information about how students are performing in sub-content areas within standards.

·     PSD is providing expanded data analysis training for teachers, principals, and curriculum facilitators so they can effectively use the data to improve instructional strategies.

·     PSD continues to educate parents and encourage parental support and involvement in their student’s education.

 

Distribution of School Accountability Reports

Every family will receive a School Accountability Reports from their child’s school in late December or early January, depending on when schools receive the fliers from CDE. Elementary school parents will receive a report in their student’s weekly school folder, and junior and senior high school parents will receive a report by mail.

 

The reports are also available on the State of Colorado website at www.cde.state.co.us.  For additional information, contact John Passantino at 490-3124.


PSD School Accountability Report Ratings, 2007 and 2008

 

Elementary Schools

2007     Overall Academic Performance

2007 Academic Growth of Students

2008     Overall Academic Performance

2008 Academic Growth of Students

Bacon

High

Improvement

High

High

Bauder

High

Improvement

Average

Typical

Beattie

High

Improvement

High

Typical

Bennett

High

Improvement

Excellent

High

Cache la Poudre

High

Improvement

High

Typical

Dunn

Excellent

Improvement

Excellent

High

Eyestone

Average

Stable

Average

Typical

Harris Bilingual

High

Significant Improvement

Average

High

Irish

Average

Improvement

Average

High

Johnson

High

Stable

High

Typical

Kruse

High

Improvement

High

High

Lab School

High

Stable

Average

Typical

Laurel

Average

Stable

Average

Low

Linton

High

Improvement

High

Typical

Livermore

Excellent

Significant Improvement

Excellent

High

Lopez

High

Stable

High

High

McGraw

High

Improvement

High

High

Moore

Average

Significant Improvement

Average

Typical

O'Dea

High

Significant Improvement

High

Typical

Olander

High

Improvement

High

Typical

Putnam

Average

Improvement

Average

Low

Red Feather

High

Stable

High

No Rating

Rice

 

 

High

Typical

Riffenburgh

High

Decline

High

Typical

Shepardson

High

Significant Improvement

High

High

Stove Prairie

Excellent

Stable

Excellent

Typical

Tavelli

High

Stable

High

Typical

Timnath

High

Improvement

High

High

Traut

Excellent

Improvement

Excellent

High

Werner

Excellent

Improvement

Excellent

High

Zach

Excellent

Improvement

Excellent

High

Junior High Schools

2007     Overall Academic Performance

2007 Academic Growth of Students

2008     Overall Academic Performance

2008 Academic Growth of Students

Blevins

High

Improvement

High

Low

Boltz

High

Stable

High

Low

Cache la Poudre Jr. High

High

Decline

High

Typical

Kinard

Excellent

Stable

Excellent

Low

Lesher

High

Decline

High

Low

Lincoln

Low

Decline

Average

Typical

Mountain View

(Alternative program; no longer in existence)

Exempt

No Measure Assigned

Low

Low

Polaris Expeditionary Learning School

 

 

Average

Low

Preston

High

Stable

High

Typical

Webber

Excellent

Stable

High

Typical

Wellington

High

Stable

High

High

Senior High Schools

2007     Overall Academic Performance

2007 Academic Growth of Students

2008     Overall Academic Performance

2008 Academic Growth of Students

Fort Collins

High

Stable

High

Low

Fossil Ridge

Excellent

Decline

Excellent

Low

Polaris Expeditionary Learning School

 

 

Low

(Participation Noted)

Low

Poudre

High

Decline

High

Typical

Rocky Mountain

High

Decline

High

Low

Alternative Education Programs or Schools

2007     Overall Academic Performance

2007 Academic Growth of Students

2008     Overall Academic Performance

2008 Academic Growth of Students

Centennial

Exempt

No Measure Assigned

Alternative

Educ. Campus

Alternative Educ. Campus

New Vista

Exempt

No Measure Assigned

 

 

Peak

(Alternative program; no longer in existence)

Exempt

No Measure Assigned

Unreportable

(Middle School)

Unsatisfactory

(High School—

Participation Noted)

Unreportable

(Middle School)

No Rating

(High School)

Poudre Transition Center

Exempt

No Measure Assigned

Alternative

Educ. Campus

Alternative Educ. Campus

Charter Schools

2007     Overall Academic Performance

2007 Academic Growth of Students

2008     Overall Academic Performance

2008 Academic Growth of Students

Liberty Common

Excellent  (Elementary)                                    Excellent  (Middle School)

Stable  (Elementary)                                  Significant Improvement  (Middle School)

Excellent

(Elementary)

Excellent

(Middle School)

Typical

(Elementary)

High

(Middle School)

Pioneer

(became Polaris Expeditionary Learning School fall 2007)

Average    (Middle School)                           Average         (High School)

Decline    (Middle School)                         Stable        (High School)

 

 

Ridgeview

High  (Elementary)                     Excellent  (Middle School)           Excellent      (High School)

Decline     (Elementary)                            Stable         (Middle School)                   Improvement    (High School)

High

(Elementary)

Excellent

(Middle School)

Excellent

(High School)

Typical

(Elementary)

Typical

(Middle School)

High

(High School)

 

Exempt: school or program was designated as an alternative school and is exempt from ratings.

 

Overall Academic Performance: Refers to performance on CSAP (Colorado Student Assessment Program) tests in elementary and junior high schools and the 10th-grade CSAP and 11th-grade ACT scores in high schools. Scores from all 2006 CSAP tests and the 2006 statewide ACT assessment were used to calculate a school’s overall academic rating. For CSAP tests, the rating includes reading, writing, math and science scores. For the ACT assessment, the rating includes reading, English (writing), and math sub-scores.

 

Academic Growth of Students: Calculated for the first time in 2005, shows a school-wide average for students achieving academic growth in each level of content standards. A detailed explanation of how the measure is calculated by the Colorado Department of Education (CDE) is on page 1.

 

|
Poudre School District 2407 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521 (970) 482-7420
© Poudre School District 2013 | Privacy Policy